Forum Posts Feed
MindManager back for Mac
< Next Topic | Back to topic list | Previous Topic >
Pages: < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > Last ›
Posted by washere
Mar 18, 2018 at 01:51 PM
That sort of people never pay anybody unless forced by the courts, they get paid.
Posted by satis
Mar 18, 2018 at 02:36 PM
Andy Brice wrote:
SetApp is an interesting idea. I wonder how much of that monthly fee
>goes to the developers? Do they pay the developers according to how much
>their software used, or a flat fee?
Devs get paid monthly.
https://insights.dice.com/2018/01/31/setapp-proves-worth-developers/
Posted by Andy Brice
Mar 18, 2018 at 05:33 PM
>https://insights.dice.com/2018/01/31/setapp-proves-worth-developers/
“It’s a good business model for MacPaw, but the payout model for developers is still a bit murky.”
Indeed!
Anyway I get the impression that only ‘famous’ apps are offered - Indie devs need not apply.
—
Andy Brice
https://www.hyperplan.com
Posted by satis
Mar 18, 2018 at 05:56 PM
Not sure what ‘indie’ apps are to you but those are virtually all independent, small developers and the apps are pretty much all well-selected: well-reviewed, supported apps from developers who are less likely to disappear than new, unproven ones.
Customers paying $108/year want the selection to be well-chosen and containing up-to-date, proven apps. And whomever is running Setapp was smart to make deals with such apps’ developers, not offer a dog’s breakfast of poorly curated (or duplicative) apps most people don’t know.
Posted by MadaboutDana
Mar 19, 2018 at 09:58 AM
Agree with satis here - setapp was set up specifically for small devs, and I correspond with several of them directly (Manuscript, Timer, Findings et al). There are a couple of more significant companies there (e.g. Ulysses, maybe Agenda - although I think they’re a 2-man band), but they’re not exactly enormous. So it might be worth looking at for HyperPlan, too.
Cheers,
Bill