Yeah, good points! I was just thinking that it would help me, as an amateur athlete, to think through my options. I'd then also be able to systematically practice the sequences, see which ones I was less comfortable with, identify possibilities for improvement, etc.

A complex software representation of this is not at all necessary, as so many masters for so many generations have been amazing without anything like that.

But if it wasn't a huge amount of work to build something simple and illuminating, I was thinking, it would be kind of cool. But I don't want to be in the position of spending way more time tinkering with the software than the actual sport... :-)

MadaboutDana wrote:

Heh, I didn't want to discourage you, sorry! But on the other hand,
maybe you need to define exactly what you want this tool for? Is it for
learning? Reminding? Giving an already experienced practitioner choices?
The appropriate tool could depend on precisely how you're going to use
it.

digeratus wrote:
Well this is sounding increasingly like I should just go with pen and
>paper :D