I don't really care about being locked into an OS, as that's why I chose it. Plus, data doesn't need to be locked in ie markdown files for text, etc. Even with Obsidian and VScode, there are notable oddities and performance issues. You can tell they're Electron.

In the end, macOS as an example will find users moving to cheaper OS's if the user experience deteriorates due to OS agnostic apps. If every app you use works on linux, why pay for Windows or macOS? I understand the code once run everywhere concept, but personally would choose OS native apps every time.

Christoph wrote:

Simon - ok I'll bite.

The problem with OS specific coded apps is that you end up in the walled
garden of your Apple word, and you can never leave it because your most
important apps only run on MacOs and you are so used to the Mac
keyboard. I like when I have the freedom to move away to another OS
knowing that I can continue to use my most favorite apps there. Sure,
developers could provide their software as native apps for all the major
platforms, but the development cost and the cost of the product as well.
Also, development pace would come to a crawl, because features need to
implemented in all the different apps. That's why Evernote went that
road. The maintenance burden of the different apps on the different
platforms was simply too high. The idea to consolidate was not a bad
one, it was just badly carried out. And I really don't think all
platform-independent apps are ugly or slow. Yes, many of them are. But
there are many very usable, stylish and sufficiently fast platform
independent apps, including Electron apps. I'm thinking of Visual Studio
Code and Obsidian for example. The user communities of such apps are
also much greater and more diverse because they do not only cosist of
Mac users. I really hate it when shiny new apps are only available for
Mac. Yes, Apple is nice, and there are many great native apps for Mac,
but I know that as soon as I buy a Mac, I will be locked into the Apple
world, and need to buy expensive hardware from a single company from
then on, and can never go back.

Simon wrote:
I'm here to lament the demise of OS specific coded apps. There is an
>increasing trend to use Java, Electron, Catalyst and the like. Why do I
>dislike this? Because the user experience in general is pants. I don't
>know what Microsoft use, but on my mac I can't use simple shortcuts
such
>as CMD A or E to get to the beginning or end of a line. It irks me.
Also
>the UI changes, slower responses and general sluggishness. The
>difference between native macOS apps and these imposter apps is as
>different as night and day.
>
>Is this what we have to look forward to? Apps coded once that kinda
work
>on all platforms, but are unpleasant in the main and don't integrate
>with any OS well?