Forum Posts Feed
A bit off topic ? Archivarius 3000
< Next Topic | Back to topic list | Previous Topic >
Posted by Wojciech
Mar 20, 2010 at 01:59 PM
Derek Cornish wrote:
>In the event, Zoot 6 has changed the form of its databases and
>they can now be indexed and searched, and the results displayed very well in dtSearch -
>without any prior database file conversion. For me this was another reason both for
>keeping on with dtSearch and moving over to Zoot 6.
Derek,
I am sorry for being so late in thanking you for your comment. I needed several weeks to decide whether I should add Zoot to my information processing instrumentation and finally refrained from it. I have my staff in many (I should say: *too* many) various PIMs and hesitate to start another change in my working habits.
Anyhow, thank you very much.
Posted by Wojciech
Mar 20, 2010 at 02:06 PM
Alexander,
I visited the homepage of Archivarius yesterday and everything was OK ? no single warning. Thus, I downloaded the most recent version 4.29 and sent it to Virus Total
for checking. One out of some 40 antivirus engines accepted it but Symantec marked as suspicious:
Symantec 20091.2.0.41 2010.03.19 Suspicious.Insight
What do you think about it?
Cheers!
Posted by Alexander Deliyannis
Mar 20, 2010 at 10:16 PM
Wojciech,
I personally wouldn’t worry, as the explanation is probably quite simple: Archivarius probably includes patterns / templates for the multitude of files that it can index, and some of these may be considered unfavourably by Symantec.
I do suggest that you inform the developer; he may be able to find a solution.
Cheers
Posted by Wojciech
Mar 21, 2010 at 03:49 PM
Alexander,
many thanks. Yes, I will contact the developer, also because I would like to ask him for even more file formats to be indexed :)
All the best,
Wojciech
Posted by critStock
Mar 22, 2010 at 01:41 AM
Archivarius looks great. I’ve downloaded the trial and find it very promising. Sadly, the trial version limits the number of files you can index, which makes it pretty hard to evaluate, in my view. One of the primary factors in choosing a search app is how well it performs with a real-world quantity of files. Kind of bummed about that….