Forum Posts Feed
InfoHesiveEP at 'bitsdujour' on 02/11/2009
< Next Topic | Back to topic list | Previous Topic >
Posted by Titus Paul
Nov 4, 2009 at 07:36 AM
Hi Mitchell Kastner,
I have answered your questions in the support ticket that you have raised.
Kind Regards,
Titus Paul
2BrightSparks Pte Ltd
http://www.2brightsparks.com
Power with Ease - Indispensable Utility Software
Mitchell Kastner wrote:
>I cannot discern the reason for the difference between a topic and an article. Much
>more troublingly, I cannot create a topic on the same level as the immediately
>preceding topic. I can create articles, which are children of topics, on the same
>level but I cannot create a child article to the immediately preceding parent
>article. My inability to drill down from an upper level to a lower level without
>restriction makes this software virtually useless to me. Again, prehaps, because I
>purchased the license this morning, I do not know how to drill down, but I have been
>using outline software since KAMAS, a CP/M product on my Kaypro, so I have some
>familiarity with outliners, and I have never had any of these limitations.
>
>If
>someone knows what I am doing wrong I hope you reply to this post.
>
>Thanks.
Posted by MadaboutDana
Dec 10, 2009 at 11:24 PM
I’ve been playing with InfoHesive since it was a beta duckling, and it’s come on a long way in a relatively short time. Version 1.0 was quite impressive, but rather slow. Version 2.0 is a whole lot faster, has very powerful search facilities, and also has good export capabilities (EssentialPIM remains my yardstick for seriously great HTML exporting, mind!). I’ve not tried the eBook features yet, but suspect they’ll be pretty good.
But moving off topic, I find I’m shifting more and more over to web-enabled (albeit self-hosted) applications, and my eye has recently been caught by the astonishing eyeOS, which is about to do for online computing (sorry, that’s cloud computing, isn’t it?!) what Newton did for gravity. We’re running a version 1.0 installation on an in-house web server, and it’s already very good. But version 2.0, due out in January - well, it looks promising, ‘nuff said…