Despite being turned off by the claim that Cyborganize will be 'bigger than Facebook' (it won't, and the claim undermines your efforts), I tried to comprehend its value by watching your video and reading the content on your site.

I still can't decide whether Cyborganize is a wonderful innovation or a 'standard outliner' buried beneath grandiose claims. For example:

It is lossless AND frictionless.

Those terms are meaningless. No one is going to say 'ah, finally, a solution that is both lossless AND frictionless!'

Can't you simply and succintly state the benefits of Cyborganize, preferably with annotated screenshots, and avoid such turn-off claims as:

It?s the most advanced system in existence. There is no other like it in the world.

Let me make that determination. Unfortunately, given what I found on your site, I can't. For me, the best solution is one that doesn't involve a lot of thinking to master. It should be intuitive, it should require little more than a couple of bullet points and a couple of screenshots to make the 'sale'.

Cyborganize seems like too much work to achieve nebulous benefits.

Noteliner is just a standard outliner, and MyInfo is a database outliner. Neither is suitable.

Noteliner is a bit more than a standard outliner. Have you used it?

Good luck with your project.


JBfromBrainStormWFO wrote:

Daly:

Anything that works on paper will work on a computer. But something designed
for paper will inherently fail to take advantage of the full capabilities of the
digital medium.

I'm not worried about my claims failing to pan out. To understand
the right/left brain distinction, read "Refactor Your Wetware."

You can use
either BrainStormWFO or MaxThink for Cyborganize, and I'm sure other tools will be
developed.

Noteliner is just a standard outliner, and MyInfo is a database
outliner. Neither is suitable.

Thanks for following along,
~JB