Outliner Software
Home Forum Archives Search Login Register


 

Outliner Software Forum RSS Feed Forum Posts Feed

Subscribe by Email

CRIMP Defined

 

Tip Jar

On the Aesthetics of Outliners, Pims, and Personal Knowledge Applications

View this topic | Back to topic list

Posted by Alexander Deliyannis
Oct 22, 2009 at 01:12 PM

 

Stephen Zeoli wrote:
>I don’t believe that aesthetics deals
>strictly with the visual, which was my point about GrandView. GV’s beauty was in its
>functionality, both in its usability and in how it allowed you to access those
>functions.

I’d say this sums up most of my ideas on the subject. It also probably explains Apple’s success with its products: “Form Facilitates Function”

(I sincerely hoped nobody would have phrased it lilke that before, but they have: http://www.hockeymonkey.com/warrior-hockey-gloves-bully.html and http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?s=e241dfc076d9312cee73c3218707072a&showtopic=833756 very recently actually)

That said, there are obviously cultural / habit influences involved as well: I have kept the same space-saving small icons / “classic” windows layout for several versions of Windows, while my screen’s resolution has been growing. Nowadays, people will look at my 11.1” 1366 x 768 notebook screen and ask “how can you work with such small letters” but for me it’s perfect.

Similarly, I appreciate simple, clear, uncluttered working spaces, and will go the extra mile to learn keyboard shortcuts for applications I use often, so that I can get rid of most toolbars.

Brainstorm is the ideal writing environment for me and in some ways it resembles Word Perfect for DOS’ empty dark screen: I use a very dark blue background with yellow letters. The fact that several contemporary software provides similar writing space (WriteMonkey, Q10, http://writer.bighugelabs.com/) probably means that I am not alone in my preference for the simple and eye-relaxing.

 


© 2006-2025 Pixicom - Some Rights Reserved. | Tip Jar