New look at old, boring controversy

Posted by quant
Mar 24, 2008 at 07:21 AM

>>ehm, people usually use RSS for
>>things like that (which is well
>executed in Safari btw.)
> >So, the availability of features and services to
>compensate for speed make speed immaterial?

not at all, I just think you didn’t pick up the best reason to support your “speed” argument here.

As with all of the software, it’s a matter of preference. Even if I were to accept the statistics on Apple’s site, the html speed of Safari in seconds being 2.09, Firefox 3.6, IE 4, ... the speed would come relevant only if you we clicking/opening/loading websites hundreds or thousands of times per day ... not impossible, but certainly not my case ;-)