UltraRecall Roadmap posted

Posted by Daly de Gagne
Jun 29, 2007 at 12:56 AM

An observation, Ken. It wasn’t so long ago that Kinook could do no wrong. UR was the wonder kid on the block. More recently, we are hearing repeated complaints about error messages, and my observation is that the K team is not as quick at replying to messages as they once were.

And we still have a help file that seems more aimed at telling us what the software will do rather than how we might do it.

All of this may mean something—or nothing.

At this point I nostalgically, yet again, open up ADM for a while, and play around with it until the common sense strikes home that it makes no sense to commit to using software when it is not clear the developer is still committed to developing it. Contrary to what some have said, I think ADM had more going for it than UR—at least from a writer’s perspective.

So I wait for the new Zoot, and the new MyInfo, and wonder how the new version of MD InfoHandler will play out.

Daly

Ken wrote:
>Hi Jan,
> >Hert and the DAM applications aren’t giving you enough grief, that you still
>have time for a bit of CRIMP? ;) And I thought I was the only one crazy enough to tackle
>these two areas of software at the same time? In all seriousness, thanks for the
>head-up on UR. I have looked at it off and on for several months, but the learning curve
>seems steeper than IDImager. Perhaps I’ll give it a look again. Any suggestions for
>how to approach UR and not ending up frustrated?
> >—Ken